|
|
Post by hockeyeyes on Dec 10, 2005 22:44:15 GMT -5
I guess 50 years of being a trash team is not going to wear off quickly. Its really disappointing to watch a team with win potential and little or no class. Winning looks so much better if you dont play moron at the same time. Will they ever learn?  |
|
|
|
Post by cant contain on Dec 10, 2005 23:16:59 GMT -5
Hey Hockeyeyes...your a joke. Doms couldn't skate with the Eagles after the 1st. Even with the refs help and quick whistles on 2 plays that resulted in non goals. Speaking of class maybe someone in your organization should speak to Carr about being an idiot. See your sorry ass team on the 22nd and we'll see if he has the balls to chirp Hand again. My guess is he'll develop some mystery ailment like Tailbetweenthelegsitis and stay home.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 11, 2005 1:23:30 GMT -5
Carr is a liability to Guelph. Get him out of there. Come on Guelph, he is nothing more than a crap disturber. Bad hockey player all around.
|
|
|
|
Post by muskoka on Dec 11, 2005 11:17:37 GMT -5
Hockeyeyes, another posting where you slam this league and a team. Maybe the Eagles don't fit your definition of class but if I'm notmistaken wasn't that Carr behaving in an inappropriate manner when he was ejected from the game?
|
|
|
|
Post by hockeyeyes on Dec 11, 2005 11:17:53 GMT -5
Its almost humorous to hear from a team with an amoeba like naylor on its roster say anything about the conduct of other team players. I would expect you to be cheering carr like you thought he should be on your team when he acts up. Think about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by hockeyeyes on Dec 11, 2005 11:30:58 GMT -5
Muskoka Im not slamming the league at all, teams yes, players yes. I am a guelph fan and I kick their ass if their performance disturbs me = no bias, right? Its not mine, there is only one definition of class, just take off the cl and you have the other thing.
|
|
