|
|
Post by jspliff on Oct 23, 2005 15:12:56 GMT -5
who won
waterloo or camberidge?
and who were the goaltenders?
|
|
|
|
Post by guest on Oct 23, 2005 15:42:47 GMT -5
5-4 Cambridge in OT,
Way and Lobsinger
|
|
|
|
Post by guest on Oct 23, 2005 16:58:56 GMT -5
both goalies played good
|
|
No D in Siskinville
Guest
|
Post by No D in Siskinville on Oct 23, 2005 18:15:32 GMT -5
For a 1st place team Cambridge look horrible. Leading league scorer " Ford " was invisible. Only reason Cambridge won was because of Waterloos WEAK-SOFT defense. Apparently they have lost all minor hockey skills that tell you to take the man not the puck. Every single Hawk goal was because Waterloo D took puck and not man and got walked around like they werent there.OOps sorry not all goals there was one where Waterloo D gave puck away for a breakaway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Oct 23, 2005 18:22:43 GMT -5
Waterloo come play Cambridge in their barn. Cambridge isn't used to the huge ice. Waterloo needs to find a rink that isn't the size of a small city.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Oct 23, 2005 18:24:48 GMT -5
Ohhh and to add to that. Waterloo get some fans too. It's like playing Pee Wee hockey again when you play there. Oh wait the Pee Wee teams in Waterloo do get more fans than the Siskins.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wintercawks on Oct 23, 2005 22:13:24 GMT -5
U just answered your own question about the fans idiot. Large rink crowds look smaller duhhh!
Cant believe someone from the amazing hawks is complaining about big ice surface, If your team is as good as u think they should love a large surface to prove how good they are but that wasnt the case.They cant skate on big surface and proved it today by being outplayed by lowly Waterloo. You better hope you keep getting that awesome goaltending because its all you got.
|
|
