|
Goalies
Sept 20, 2005 2:21:59 GMT -5
Post by zao on Sept 20, 2005 2:21:59 GMT -5
Sherer looked shakey vs. Cambridge but was solid vs. Kitchener.
I havn't seen Vanwyck play, how has he looked? The numbers don't look good.
If the Kings can get good goaltending, it's gonna be a great year.
|
|
|
Goalies
Sept 22, 2005 10:31:23 GMT -5
Post by Homer on Sept 22, 2005 10:31:23 GMT -5
Both goalies should be nervous. As 87s they run the risk of being replaced by a 19 or 20 year old down the stretch. If they both play well neither has anything to worry about. Gotta get their GAA < 2.00 and the team has to play better in the D zone.
|
|
|
Goalies
Oct 1, 2005 22:18:52 GMT -5
Post by guest on Oct 1, 2005 22:18:52 GMT -5
they arent 87s
|
|
|
Post by homer on Oct 2, 2005 9:57:49 GMT -5
Better check your info both Kings goalies were born in 1987. Go to kings.on.ca
|
|
|
Goalies
Oct 23, 2005 2:44:19 GMT -5
Post by mothers of player on Oct 23, 2005 2:44:19 GMT -5
mothers of players, quit endorcing your sons
|
|
|
Goalies
Oct 23, 2005 21:33:50 GMT -5
Post by homer on Oct 23, 2005 21:33:50 GMT -5
Shut Up u moron!
|
|
|
Goalies
Oct 25, 2005 0:48:59 GMT -5
Post by puck on Oct 25, 2005 0:48:59 GMT -5
thanks mom
|
|
|
Goalies
Oct 26, 2005 9:26:04 GMT -5
Post by homer on Oct 26, 2005 9:26:04 GMT -5
Get something straight I'm not anyones mother! And you must be an idiot to come to that conclusion from the info discussed in this thread. The point is that neither goalie in Elmira is safe. If a good 19 or 20 year old comes available at playoffs one will be gone. personally I don't care who. Good bye Puck!
|
|