|
|
Post by Oh well on Oct 16, 2005 12:37:27 GMT -5
Cambridge has been pumping in the goals and the troubles on the blue line didn't show up other than in constantly being outshot. Time to shore up the D guys. Snowdon is looking stronger every game. They will put it together. Keep the faith Winterhawks fans.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnny on Oct 16, 2005 13:15:00 GMT -5
i agree. too many turnovers by the winterhawks D. Snowdon is playing very well, hes a guy that moves opponents from the front of the net easily. he is a good PK too. sheridan is still a bit slow off the gun. zych is a great young defensmen. bonniville rushes way too much considering his d partner is usually slow and doesnt handle odd man rushes quite as well. and watts is so inconsistant, sometimes i think hes a great D, other times i hoped theyd just send him back to jr C. all in all, i think they are still a good core of D. they better just start working harder and showing up like the offense usually does.
|
|
|
|
Post by k on Oct 16, 2005 14:46:58 GMT -5
2 games against the Eagles this season....10 gaa
|
|
|
|
Post by Winterhawks Fan on Oct 16, 2005 16:02:50 GMT -5
Brantford has a great team now that they have signed all those players and there are some more that are supposed to be getting signed. Brantford will give cambridge a run for 1st place this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by k on Oct 16, 2005 16:25:08 GMT -5
you got it baby
|
|
|
|
Post by k on Oct 16, 2005 21:06:23 GMT -5
By the way how do you give up over 100 shots in 2 games and still expect to be at the top 'o the heap?...Lobsinger chased last night is not a good sign if the Hawks hope to take top spot.
|
|
|
|
Post by guest on Oct 16, 2005 21:37:30 GMT -5
lobsinger absolutley stood on his head against listowel with 63 saves and against brantford he had no chance on any of the 3 goals he let in all brutal giveaways by the D. and he stopped a breakaway.
|
|
|
|
Post by guy on Nov 7, 2005 19:17:09 GMT -5
like to know who on the coaching staff is in love with zech....what an terrible defencemen. should be a forward. can't stop anybody. cambridge wants to keep losing then they should keeping playing him and bonneville. neither one can play defence but they can't play them enough. maybe the coaching staff should just play 5 forwards and leave the defencemen on the bench
|
|
|
|
Post by hawk fan on Nov 7, 2005 22:28:02 GMT -5
zych cant play defence?  why did ktichener offer him a spot on their roster this year then??? |
|
|
|
Post by guy on Nov 8, 2005 7:03:54 GMT -5
so why didn't he go. becacause he knew the opp. forwards would eat him alive. too small to clear anyone in front on the net,all he does is back up and back up. put a pair of pads on him
|
|
|
|
Post by guest on Nov 8, 2005 21:33:19 GMT -5
actually b/c he has been approached many many different schools who have been putting offers on the table
|
|
|
|
Post by guy on Nov 9, 2005 8:00:55 GMT -5
hope they like small noneffective defencemen that are too scared to go into a corner
|
|
|
|
Post by vaseline on Nov 19, 2005 23:22:19 GMT -5
ineffective? top 6 in the league in points among d, figure that one out
|
|
|
|
Post by pete on Nov 20, 2005 16:35:02 GMT -5
its simply called defence. Do you understand that defencemen are supposed to stop the opposition from scoring. Maybe with all those points he should be a forward...cause he can't stop anyone one on one, can't hold the line and can't get the puck out of the corner; hence, play defence....i think the position your looking for is called a FORWARD. DEFENCEMEN worry how many pucks they keep out of the net. Good for him, he scores 1, but lets 3 in. Sorry, your right, he is a great defencemen. What are you his father. Who cares but you how many points he has. Surely not other players or anyone else on this site
|
|
|
|
Post by guy on Nov 21, 2005 16:02:38 GMT -5
who do you think would be the best defenceman then on the team, by that definition
|
|
|
|
Post by GO HAWKS GO on Nov 21, 2005 17:10:35 GMT -5
his +/- is actually much better than you think, watch the next couple of games.....
|
|
|
|
Post by hawk fan on Nov 26, 2005 11:53:04 GMT -5
it sure would be nice to see traccito and sheridan get a roughing BEFORE the whistle penalty.
it always seems to be after the whistle.
in orangeville last night the two of them combined to put the winter hawks short handed for a complete period.
let's wake up here.
let's pick up your physical play not your 'the referee will protect me' after the whistle stuff!
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Nov 26, 2005 17:06:32 GMT -5
Snowden is gone now eh, was he any good?
|
|
|
|
Post by pete on Nov 26, 2005 23:14:06 GMT -5
don't think sheridan's too concerned with the physical play. Don't think he needs to be protected by the ref. or anyone else. Don't see anyone calling him on. Think cambridge did alright. Didn't they win 7-2
|
|
|
|
Post by wait n see on Dec 18, 2005 10:20:57 GMT -5
Lobsinger faced a lot of shots and led the league in save% when he left. He will be tough to replace. Do Hawks need a #1 guy to replace him or can this George kid carry the load? Trounced Flannigan's gang last night and he looked pretty good after letting soft one in early.
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by hawkey fan on Dec 18, 2005 16:07:26 GMT -5
I agree. Lobsinger will be hard to replace and he is a great kid but don't kid yourselves. These Hawks are for real and George will be able to shoulder the load.
|
|
why did ktichener offer him a spot on their roster this year then???